Environment
Our Template and the Murray Darling

What can you say about the mess that is the management of the Murray Darling Basin? What can you say about the dodgy or missing science, the refusal to reveal the reason for decisions and the obvious harm being done to the very thing the scheme was designed to protect and serve – the environment.
Well, here at Wadayathinkothis, we say – “apply the template” – and let’s get to the bottom of this mess.
What was meant to happen?
The scheme was set up principally to protect the environment. As it was implemented that purpose grew to what is now known as the ‘triple bottom line’. All changes in water management were to be designed to benefit the environment without damaging farm and local economies and without adverse effect on the communities within the scheme.
Not so long ago, Better Times

Main Weir Menindee, Better Times Courtesy:Max Phillips via Face Group Broken Hill, Menindee Lakes and Flickr
What didn’t happen?
Well, basically none of what was meant to happen. Many years into the operation of management, the environment has suffered dramatically. Hundreds of farmers have been forced to the brink of bankruptcy with hundreds more going out of business. Communities have seen catastrophic losses to business, populations and in some cases have ceased to exist.

Image Courtesy: Rory McLeod When the River Runs Dry Campaign
What did happen?
There has been a steady and unstoppable shift of agricultural land towards bigger investors, corporations and foreign ownership. There appears to have been examples of management that has favoured certain commercial interests. And last, though by no means least, there has been the establishment of a highly profitable – for some – privatisation of Australias’ water. This has enabled ownership of this incredibly rare and vital Australian resource to go into the ownership of profiteers within the international investment scene. All farms, townships and communities within the scheme are being brought under the control of this foreign ownership of water.
The people in charge of this scheme are smart and capable
What has happened is exactly what was meant to happen. As the result of a process being guided and implemented by smart and capable people, if what happened has been exactly what was meant to happen, then what happened was the real aim of the process.
The real aim
Therefore it would appear the real aim of the MDB scheme, or at the very least the real aim of how it has been managed, is to create a highly lucrative water trading money market for investors, regardless of their country of origin. Regardless of whether it was an intended aim or not, it has facilitated the migration of farms into the hands of players successively higher and higher up the capital food chain. It has, it would appear, been used to enlist the entire population of four states to feed a money machine for which there is no foreseeable upper limit. In short, it may be concluded the aim of the management of the Murray Darling Scheme has been to transfer the water and agricultural wealth of a nation into the hands of private ownership on a scale few could imagine.
All you can say about that is that as far as those aims are concerned, it appears the Murray Darling Basin scheme has been stunningly successful and the smart and capable people administering the scheme have done a brilliant job.
Environment
Intentional and Predictable
At the core of the problems in the Murray Darling Basin lies the elephant in the room, Every single action carried out by those currently in charge is Intentional and Deliberate and the outcomes have been Predictable

At the core of the problems in the Murray Darling Basin lies the elephant in the room, Every single action carried out by the Corporations, Federal Government, The MDBA, WaterNSW, all actions by these parties are intentional.
It’s a mistake to think that these actions are mal-administration, they are in fact deliberate administration.
Included in these intentional actions is the framing of the legislation ( The Water Act 2007 ) and the creation of the Murray Darling Basin Authority. All Intentional. Further, these intentional acts have been supported through successive Labour and LNP governments.
The fact that there is no royal commission into the scheme is also intentional.
Water being allowed to be traded off farm and internationally, Intentional.

Foreign investors profiteering from Australian water at the expense of Australian Farmers
Corporations funded by tax payers to shift their operations away from the regions which are being dried up, Intentional.
Draining of the Menindee Lakes ( Rapid Draw Down Policy ), Intentional.
The destruction of a nationally significant ecosystem, Intentional.
Increased water prices and smaller farmers being forced off their land, Predictable.
Decline of Rural Communities, Predictable.
Severe community health outcomes, including suicide, depression, family breakdowns, small business destruction, and regional depopulation, KNOWN PREDICTABLE OUTCOMES.
Destruction of environments, Predictable and Intentional.
The only way we can address these problems is to redress the environmental modifications carried out by corporate agribusiness, halt rapid draw down from Menindee Lakes and decommission the Wentworth to Broken Hill Pipeline and all other infrastructure built without sound science or business plans, including reassessment of the SA Barrages and, investigate and bring to justice any minister, bureaucrat, authority and corporate entity who have acted illegally. Finally we need input and engagement with farmers, irrigators, first nations people and scientists who all need an equal seat at the table where corporate and political influence is negated via full transparency.
WADAYATHINKOTHIS?
Business
The Darling River and Menindee Lakes have been sold up and down the river
Why are the Darling River and Menindee Lakes being sold out ?

“The lakes provide significant tourism and recreation benefits to far-west NSW and are of high environmental and cultural value. Part of the lakes scheme is located within Kinchega National Park, and support more diversity of bird life than Kakadu.”
Quote from a WaterNSW Report re the Menindee Lakes
Given the poor current state of the Darling River and Menindee Lakes Systems, we thought it might be time to apply the Wadayathinkothis Template and see if we can gain further insight into this environmental, cultural and economic disaster
The template asks a few simple questions;
What was meant to happen?
The Menindee Lakes and Darling River were meant to be protected and managed under the environmental stewardship of the Murray Darling Basin Plan. Communities and economies were also not to be adversely affected by this management.
What didn’t happen?
Looking at the evidence, it’s clear that the Menindee Lakes and Darling River and their associated environments have not been protected. Communities, farmers and local economies have also not been considered.
What did happen?
An entire ecosystem has been destroyed. Millions of fish have died, the Darling river and many of it’s tributaries have run dry, The Menindee Lakes have been drained, down river farmers have been starved of irrigation water, migratory birds have died.
As if all of the above wasn’t bad enough, vast amounts of evaporation were ignorantly taken out of the natural rain cycle, with no regard for the effect this might have on the natural environment across NSW. All the while, large scale unregulated, unmetered floodplain harvesting has been allowed to continue in the northern basin.
There is also the unwanted half a billion pipeline pipeline that has been forced on the community of Broken Hill.
The people in charge of this scheme are smart and capable
What has happened is exactly what was meant to happen
As the result of a process being guided and implemented by smart and capable people, if what happened has been exactly what was meant to happen, then what happened was the real aim of the process.
The real aim
The real aim was to establish a Wentworth to Broken Hill Pipeline and to enable further mining and corporate farming interests.
Wadayathinkothis ?
-
Environment4 years ago
Intentional and Predictable
-
Politics5 years ago
Don’t think, Don’t ask, Pay tax, Vote for US
-
Health4 years ago
A generation raised on a river of pain
-
Business5 years ago
The Darling River and Menindee Lakes have been sold up and down the river
-
Humour5 years ago
Honest Government Ad, Timor Leste, Satirical truth by TheJuiceMedia
-
Spirituality5 years ago
Australia Day Wadayathinkothis ?
-
Politics4 years ago
Australian Governments Agree Small Towns are Economically Negative Assets!
-
Health4 years ago
Murray Darling Basin residents subjected to negative health and social outcomes deliberately
Paul Rossetto
February 24, 2019 at 11:37 am
Yes, agree entirely with the MDBA water trading comment above. Agricultural communities can not survive competing for water resources.
Craig
July 22, 2019 at 7:07 pm
Thanks for your reply Paul, you are 100% right, communities cannot compete for these water resources, it is not a level playing field like the politicians are trying to convince us they are. Corporations are being given a hand up by government.